[WikiEN-l] Slashdot: Book plagarized Wikipedia

[Thomas Dalton]

> Arguing that you have not read the contract does not absolve you of its
> terms.  With many licences simply availing oneself of their benefits
> includes an implicit agreement with the terms of the licence.  This can
> be the case with shrinkwraped licences where if you break the seal, you
> agree to the licence.

I didn't say "not read", I said "not agreed to". I seem to remember
shrinkwrapped licenses were on shaky legal ground - did that issue
ever get resolved in court?