[WikiEN-l] status correction

[geni]

On 11/4/05, steve v <vertigosteve at yahoo.com> wrote:
> This is at the heart of the matter, and why the
> majority voted to punt it back: Under no circumstances
> would a post-RFAR RFA possibly be considered to be a
> "normal one." Ask yourself, Benjamin: how is the
> community to make heads or tails of an RFA as a remedy
> for a case which the Arbcom itself could only find
> generic 'findings of fact'?

I think the somunity made it's feelings pretty clear at the RFC but no matter.

You are the second admin to end up on arbcom after pulling a 3RR block
I placed on them, In neither case has arbcom had the guts to make a
straight descission.

--
geni