On 11/4/05, steve v <vertigosteve(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
This is at the heart of the matter, and why the
majority voted to punt it back: Under no circumstances
would a post-RFAR RFA possibly be considered to be a
"normal one." Ask yourself, Benjamin: how is the
community to make heads or tails of an RFA as a remedy
for a case which the Arbcom itself could only find
generic 'findings of fact'?
I think the somunity made it's feelings pretty clear at the RFC but no matter.
You are the second admin to end up on arbcom after pulling a 3RR block
I placed on them, In neither case has arbcom had the guts to make a
straight descission.
--
geni