[WikiEN-l] When Powerful Jewish or Social-Marxist-PC Lobbies Censor the Internet....

[Mr Paul Vogel]

Dear Jens, Pedro, Mark, etc. et al:

When any Powerful Jewish or Social-Marxist-PC Lobbies
Censor the Internet...or RULE...EVERYONE ELSE ACTUALLY
PAYS THE VERY HIGH PRICE, as the events of 9/11/01 and
since have thereafter demonstrated. 

Jews and Social-Marxists also obviously
do have control over both the Wikipedia
Arbitration Committee and in banning and
in censoring anything or banning or 
censoring anyone editing Wikipedia 
that is not considered "Kosher" 
enough by them. 
This is also the actual and real reason for 
the undo one year ban and extensions, based
upon the dishonest and unfair judgement of
this same "Kosher" Arbitration Committee and
cabal of lying hypocrites and censors.

Like AIPAC and the Spy Scandal and Pollard
etc. ad nauseum, and the "Neo-Con", actually
"Zionist-Jewish" Kosher Conservative, invasion
of Iraq, soon Iran and then maybe Syria, based
upon lies and hypocrisy and instigated by
same-EVERYONE PAYS THE VERY HIGH PRICE for this biased
JEWISH and SOCIAL-MARXIST-PC CENSORSHIP and RULE!

For example:


A Look at The 'Powerful Jewish Lobby'
by Mark Weber 

For decades Israel has violated well established
precepts of 
international law and defied numerous United Nations
resolutions in 
its occupation of conquered lands, in extra-judicial
killings, and in 
its repeated acts of military aggression.

Most of the world regards Israel's policies, and
especially its 
oppression of Palestinians, as outrageous and
criminal. This 
international consensus is reflected, for example, in
numerous UN 
resolutions condemning Israel, which have been
approved with 
overwhelming majorities.

"The whole world," United Nations Secretary General
Kofi Annan 
recently said, "is demanding that Israel withdraw
[from occupied 
Palestinian territories]. I don't think the whole
world ... can be 
wrong." [1]

Only in the United States do politicians and the media
still fervently 
support Israel and its policies. For decades the US
has provided 
Israel with crucial military, diplomatic and financial
backing, 
including more than $3 billion each year in aid.

Why is the U.S. the only remaining bastion of support
for Israel?

Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, who was awarded
the 1984 Nobel 
Peace Prize, has candidly identified the reason: "The
Israeli 
government is placed on a pedestal [in the US], and to
criticize it is 
to be immediately dubbed anti-Semitic," he said.
"People are scared in 
this country, to say wrong is wrong because the Jewish
lobby is 
powerful — very powerful." [2]

Bishop Tutu spoke the truth. Although Jews make up
only about three 
percent of the US population, they wield immense power
and influence — 
vastly more than any other ethnic or religious group.

As Jewish author and political science professor
Benjamin Ginsberg has 
pointed out: [3]

Since the 1960s, Jews have come to wield considerable
influence in 
American economic, cultural, intellectual and
political life. Jews 
played a central role in American finance during the
1980s, and they 
were among the chief beneficiaries of that decade's
corporate mergers 
and reorganizations. Today, though barely two percent
of the nation's 
population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires
are Jews. The 
chief executive officers of the three major television
networks and 
the four largest film studios are Jews, as are the
owners of the 
nation's largest newspaper chain and the most
influential single 
newspaper, the New York Times ... The role and
influence of Jews in 
American politics is equally marked ...

Jews are only three percent of the nation's population
and comprise 
eleven percent of what this study defines as the
nation's elite. 
However, Jews constitute more than 25 percent of the
elite journalists 
and publishers, more than 17 percent of the leaders of
important 
voluntary and public interest organizations, and more
than 15 percent 
of the top ranking civil servants.

Stephen Steinlight, former Director of National
Affairs of the 
American Jewish Committee, similarly notes the
"disproportionate 
political power" of Jews, which is "pound for pound
the greatest of 
any ethnic/cultural group in America." He goes on to
explain that 
"Jewish economic influence and power are
disproportionately 
concentrated in Hollywood, television, and in the news
industry." [4]

Two well-known Jewish writers, Seymour Lipset and Earl
Raab, pointed 
out in their 1995 book, Jews and the New American
Scene: [5]

During the last three decades Jews [in the United
States] have made up 
50 percent of the top two hundred intellectuals ... 20
percent of 
professors at the leading universities ... 40 percent
of partners in 
the leading law firms in New York and Washington ...
59 percent of the 
directors, writers, and producers of the 50
top-grossing motion 
pictures from 1965 to 1982, and 58 percent of
directors, writers, and 
producers in two or more primetime television series.

The influence of American Jewry in Washington, notes
the Israeli daily 
Jerusalem Post, is "far disproportionate to the size
of the community, 
Jewish leaders and U.S. official acknowledge. But so
is the amount of 
money they contribute to [election] campaigns." One
member of the 
influential Conference of Presidents of Major American
Jewish 
Organizations "estimated Jews alone had contributed 50
percent of the 
funds for [President Bill] Clinton's 1996 re-election
campaign." [6]

"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality
of Jewish power 
and prominence in popular culture," acknowledges
Michael Medved, a 
well-known Jewish author and film critic. "Any list of
the most 
influential production executives at each of the major
movie studios 
will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish
names." [7]

One person who has carefully studied this subject is
Jonathan J. 
Goldberg, now editor of the influential Jewish
community weekly 
Forward. In his 1996 book, Jewish Power, he wrote: [8]

In a few key sectors of the media, notably among
Hollywood studio 
executives, Jews are so numerically dominant that
calling these 
businesses Jewish-controlled is little more than a
statistical 
observation ...

Hollywood at the end of the twentieth century is still
an industry 
with a pronounced ethnic tinge. Virtually all the
senior executives at 
the major studios are Jews. Writers, producers, and to
a lesser degree 
directors are disproportionately Jewish — one recent
study showed the 
figure as high as 59 percent among top-grossing films.

The combined weight of so many Jews in one of
America's most lucrative 
and important industries gives the Jews of Hollywood a
great deal of 
political power. They are a major source of money for
Democratic 
candidates.

Reflecting their role in the American media, Jews are
routinely 
portrayed as high-minded, altruistic, trustworthy,
compassionate, and 
deserving of sympathy and support. While millions of
Americans readily 
accept such stereotyped imagery, not everyone is
impressed. "I am very 
angry with some of the Jews," complained actor Marlon
Brando during a 
1996 interview. "They know perfectly well what their
responsibilities 
are ... Hollywood is run by Jews. It's owned by Jews,
and they should 
have a greater sensitivity about the issue of people
who are 
suffering." [9]
A Well-Entrenched Factor

The intimidating power of the "Jewish lobby" is not a
new phenomenon, 
but has long been an important factor in American
life.

In 1941 Charles Lindbergh spoke about the danger of
Jewish power in 
the media and government. The shy 39-year-old — known
around the world 
for his epic 1927 New York to Paris flight, the first
solo 
trans-Atlantic crossing — was addressing 7,000 people
in Des Moines, 
Iowa, on September 11, 1941, about the dangers of US
involvement in 
the war then raging in Europe. The three most
important groups 
pressing America into war, he explained, were the
British, the Jews, 
and the Roosevelt administration.

Of the Jews, he said: "Their greatest danger to this
country lies in 
their large ownership and influence in our motion
pictures, our press, 
our radio, and our government." Lindbergh went on:

... For reasons which are understandable from their
viewpoint as they 
are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not
American, [they] 
wish to involve us in the war. We cannot blame them
for looking out 
for what they believe to be their own interests, but
we must also look 
out for ours. We cannot allow the natural passions and
prejudices of 
other peoples to lead our country to destruction.

In 1978, Jewish American scholar Alfred M. Lilienthal
wrote in his 
detailed study, The Zionist Connection: [10]

How has the Zionist will been imposed on the American
people?... It is 
the Jewish connection, the tribal solidarity among
themselves and the 
amazing pull on non-Jews, that has molded this
unprecedented power ... 
In the larger metropolitan areas, the Jewish-Zionist
connection 
thoroughly pervades affluent financial, commercial,
social, 
entertainment, and art circles.

As a result of the Jewish grip on the media, wrote
Lilienthal, news 
coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict in American
television, 
newspapers and magazines is relentlessly sympathetic
to Israel. This 
is manifest, for example, in the misleading portrayal
of Palestinian 
"terrorism." As Lilienthal put it: "One-sided
reportage on terrorism, 
in which cause is never related to effect, was assured
because the 
most effective component of the Jewish connection is
probably that of 
media control."
One-Sided 'Holocaust' History

The Jewish hold on cultural and academic life has had
a profound 
impact on how Americans look at the past. Nowhere is
the well 
entrenched Judeocentric view of history more obvious
than in the 
"Holocaust" media campaign, which focuses on the fate
of Jews in 
Europe during World War II.

Israeli Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer, a professor
at Hebrew 
University in Jerusalem, has remarked: [11]

Whether presented authentically or inauthentically, in
accordance with 
the historical facts or in contradiction to them, with
empathy and 
understanding or as monumental kitsch, the Holocaust
has become a 
ruling symbol of our culture ... Hardly a month goes
by without a new 
TV production, a new film, a new drama, new books,
prose or poetry, 
dealing with the subject, and the flood is increasing
rather than 
abating.

Non-Jewish suffering simply does not merit comparable
attention. 
Overshadowed in the focus on Jewish victimization are,
for example, 
the tens of millions of victims of America's World War
II ally, 
Stalinist Russia, along with the tens of millions of
victims of 
China's Maoist regime, as well as the 12 to 14 million
Germans, 
victims of the flight and expulsion of 1944-1949, of
whom some two 
million lost their lives.

The well-financed Holocaust media and "educational"
campaign is 
crucially important to the interests of Israel. Paula
Hyman, a 
professor of modern Jewish history at Yale University,
has observed: 
"With regard to Israel, the Holocaust may be used to
forestall 
political criticism and suppress debate; it reinforces
the sense of 
Jews as an eternally beleaguered people who can rely
for their defense 
only upon themselves. The invocation of the suffering
endured by the 
Jews under the Nazis often takes the place of rational
argument, and 
is expected to convince doubters of the legitimacy of
current Israeli 
government policy." [12]

Norman Finkelstein, a Jewish scholar who has taught
political science 
at City University of New York (Hunter College), says
in his book, The 
Holocaust Industry, that "invoking The Holocaust" is
"a ploy to 
delegitimize all criticism of Jews." [13] "By
conferring total 
blamelessness on Jews, the Holocaust dogma immunizes
Israel and 
American Jewry from legitimate censure ... Organized
Jewry has 
exploited the Nazi holocaust to deflect criticism of
Israel's and its 
own morally indefensible policies." He writes of the
brazen 
"shakedown" of Germany, Switzerland and other
countries by Israel and 
organized Jewry "to extort billions of dollars." "The
Holocaust," 
Finkelstein predicts, "may yet turn out to be the
'greatest robbery in 
the history of mankind'."

Jews in Israel feel free to act brutally against
Arabs, writes Israeli 
journalist Ari Shavit, "believing with absolute
certitude that now, 
with the White House, the Senate and much of the
American media in our 
hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our
own." [14]

Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the US Joint
Chiefs of 
Staff, has spoken with blunt exasperation about the
Jewish-Israeli 
hold on the United States: [15]

I've never seen a President — I don't care who he is —
stand up to 
them [the Israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They
always get what 
they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the
time. I got to 
the point where I wasn't writing anything down. If the
American people 
understood what a grip those people have got on our
government, they 
would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't
have any idea what 
goes on.

Today the danger is greater than ever. Israel and
Jewish 
organizations, in collaboration with this country's
pro-Zionist "amen 
corner," are prodding the United States — the world's
foremost 
military and economic power — into new wars against
Israel's enemies. 
As the French ambassador in London recently
acknowledged, Israel — 
which he called "that shitty little country" — is a
threat to world 
peace. "Why should the world be in danger of World War
III because of 
those people?," he said. [16]

To sum up: Jews wield immense power and influence in
the United 
States. The "Jewish lobby" is a decisive factor in US
support for 
Israel. Jewish-Zionist interests are not identical to
American 
interests. In fact, they often conflict.

As long as the "very powerful" Jewish lobby remains
entrenched, there 
will be no end to the systematic Jewish distortion of
current affairs 
and history, the Jewish-Zionist domination of the U.S.
political 
system, Zionist oppression of Palestinians, the bloody
conflict 
between Jews and non-Jews in the Middle East, and the
Israeli threat 
to peace.
Notes
1.      Quoted in Forward (New York City), April 19,
2002, p. 11.      
2.      D. Tutu, "Apartheid in the Holy Land," The
Guardian (Britain), 
April 29, 2002.      
3.      Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and
the State 
(University of Chicago, 1993), pp. 1, 103.      
4.      S. Steinlight, "The Jewish Stake in America's
Changing 
Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration
Policy," Center for 
Immigration Studies, Nov. 2001. http://www.cis.
org/articles/2001/back1301.html      
5.      Seymour Martin Lipset and Earl Raab, Jews and
the New American 
Scene (Harvard Univ. Press, 1995), pp. 26-27.      
6.      Janine Zacharia, "The Unofficial Ambassadors
of the Jewish 
State," The Jerusalem Post (Israel), April 2, 2000.
Reprinted in 
"Other Voices," June 2000, p. OV-4, a supplement to
The Washington 
Report on Middle East Affairs.      
7.      M. Medved, "Is Hollywood Too Jewish?," Moment,
Vol. 21, No. 4 
(1996), p. 37.      
8.      Jonathan Jeremy Goldberg, Jewish Power: Inside
the American 
Jewish Establishment (Addison-Wesley, 1996), pp. 280,
287-288. See 
also pp. 39-40, 290-291.      
9.      Interview with Larry King, CNN network, April
5, 1996. "Brando 
Remarks," Los Angeles Times, April 8, 1996, p. F4
(OC). A short time 
later, Brando was obliged to apologize for his
remarks.      
10.      A. Lilienthal, The Zionist Connection (New
York: Dodd, Mead, 
1978), pp. 206, 218, 219, 229.      
11.      From a 1992 lecture, published in: David
Cesarani, ed., The 
Final Solution: Origins and Implementation (London and
New York: 
Routledge, 1994), pp. 305, 306.      
12.      Paula E. Hyman, "New Debate on the
Holocaust," The New York 
Times Magazine, Sept. 14, 1980, p. 79.      
13.      Norman G. Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry
(London, New 
York: Verso, 2000), pp. 130, 138, 139, 149.      
14.      The New York Times, May 27, 1996. Shavit is
identified as a 
columnist for Ha'aretz, a Hebrew-language Israeli
daily newspaper, 
"from which this article is adapted."      
15.      Interview with Moorer, Aug. 24, 1983. Quoted
in: Paul Findley, 
They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions
Confront Israel's 
Lobby (Lawrence Hill, 1984 and 1985), p. 161.      
16.      D. Davis, "French Envoy to UK: Israel
Threatens World Peace," 
Jerusalem Post, Dec. 20, 2001. The French ambassador
is Daniel 
Bernard.      

6/02
About the author

Mark Weber is director of the Institute for Historical
Review. He 
studied history at the University of Illinois
(Chicago), the 
University of Munich, Portland State University and
Indiana University 
(M.A., 1977). For nine years he served as editor of
the IHR's Journal 
of Historical Review.

Send $2 for a packet of literature and full listing of
books. Or, 
order more copies of this leaflet, postpaid, at the
following prices:

10 copies: $2.00 — 50 copies: $7.50
100 copies, or more: 10 cents each

INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW
Post Office Box 2739 · Newport Beach, California 92659

www.ihr.org



<br><br>
Free Speech Web Hosting <br>
http://www.1st-amendment.net

Best regards,
Paul Vogel aka the NEEDLE
http://www.cosmotheism.net

We divinely conscious humans are not apart, but are a
meaningful and purposeful part of the whole physical
Cosmos. Humans are both a mental and a spiritual
_expression and manifestation of the universe coming
into a total conscious awakening and full awareness of
both KNOWING and COMPLETING itself. Humans are the
physical manifestation of the cosmos coming into a
total awareness of itself as a UNIFIED WHOLE through
arete' and via both creative and conscious evolution. 






		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool