When it comes to censorship and Wikipedia, there are
a few things to
remember:
I feel very depressed. Very. No, I really mean *very*.
To a certain point, a nudity picture censored, I care
little.
Far worse is censorship on points I can't even begin
to understand. Some time ago, the french wikipedia was
censoring articles under the reason the term didnot
existed (for exemple, racialisme), then it censored
article under the reason the content added could be
liable by the french law, and today, it is censoring
an article because it is reporting french law
condemned someone for doing illegal actions and
explain the reason why it was considered illegal by
french law.
For those understanding french, the censored part is
there
http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Jos%E9_Bov%E9&diff=47546&…
Honest, I do not get it.
You would not believe it, there was even a comparison
with the article on [[Adolph Hitler]]. What is that
law's name already ? I fail to see the comparison
between Adolph Hitler and Jos� Bov� :-(((
Hmmmm...the english wiki is willing to report law
condemnation and to censor erotic picture. The french
wiki is censoring law condemnation explanation, but
keeping erotic picture.
Look...maybe...merging articles, we could happen to do
something proper ?
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com