Hi Taha,
That's a very nice review you're working on.
For finding potentially missing related papers, browsing the topical directory of WikiLit
should help you find a lot of papers that you consider "related":
http://wikilit.referata.com/wiki/Category:Topics.
Unfortunately, one of WikiLit's major weaknesses is that, although it includes most
peer-reviewed journal articles, it is missing many conference papers (though it has almost
100).
~ Chitu
Taha Yasseri a écrit :
Hello Everybody,
Few days ago, we have submitted a manuscript, reviewing some of our recent work +
comparisons to others + some new results.
A pre-print is at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5130
The aim of the paper is to provide a mini review especially for those ones who are not
very familiar with the field. However, the paper is clearly biased in coverage in favour
of our topics of interest and also mentioning only those papers that I come across! Since
the first characteristic, being limited in topical coverage, is fine, the second one,
potential missing of related papers should be cured as much as possible.
That would be highly appreciated if you could give me feedbacks of any kind, especially
on the missing literatures.
Cheers,
.Taha Yasseri
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l