Titoxd @ Wikimedia wrote:
Looks good, but there is one bit in the page that has
a bit of unclear
wording:
"The source code of every tool is licensed under a free (like BSD)
or /GPL-compatible/^[1]
<https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Toollizenz/draft/en#cite_note-0>
license by default, if it is at all possible. If this is not possible
due to a less free component (like a code library), the source code
adopts the license of the library by default."
Would it be safe to say that the source code would be dual-licensed
here, or am I reading it wrong?
Titoxd.
No. That text would allow to use the code under GPL (BSD is itself
GPL-compatible).