[Toolserver-l] stable server candidates

[James Hare]

Oh, stable as opposed to instable. Never mind.

On 11/3/07, James Hare <messedrocker at gmail.com> wrote:
> stable as in "stable versions"?
>
> On 11/3/07, River Tarnell <river at wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > to justify buying a stable server, we need people willing to use it.  so, if
> > anyone is interested in maintaining stable tools, please add your name
> > somewhere (i suggest [[m:Toolserver/Stable server/Candidates]] as a good
> > place).  the initial proposal suggested at least two maintainers per project,
> > but that isn't set in stone.  more maintainers is probably better.
> >
> > * do not add other people's projects, or list other people as maintainers
> > without asking them.  don't add yourself as a maintainer without checking
> > with the tool's author.
> >
> > * you can list people without toolserver accounts.
> >
> > this is only for stable, established projects; if your project still breaks
> > hemlock once a week, or you aren't certain it's working well, please don't
> > add it.  similarly, new project proposals will not be considered (these
> > should go to hemlock instead).
> >
> > if the stable server goes ahead, projects which are accepted will no longer be
> > owned by the original author; the development team members will each have
> > equal responsibility in their development.
> >
> > the exact configuration of the stable server, how it'll work, etc. are still
> > in discussion.  (please feel free to edit [[m:Toolserver/Stable server]] if
> > you have any suggestions).
> >
> >         - river.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Toolserver-l mailing list
> > Toolserver-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
> >
> >
> >
>