[Toolserver-l] stable server candidates

[James Hare]

stable as in "stable versions"?

On 11/3/07, River Tarnell <river at wikimedia.org> wrote:
> hello,
>
> to justify buying a stable server, we need people willing to use it.  so, if
> anyone is interested in maintaining stable tools, please add your name
> somewhere (i suggest [[m:Toolserver/Stable server/Candidates]] as a good
> place).  the initial proposal suggested at least two maintainers per project,
> but that isn't set in stone.  more maintainers is probably better.
>
> * do not add other people's projects, or list other people as maintainers
> without asking them.  don't add yourself as a maintainer without checking
> with the tool's author.
>
> * you can list people without toolserver accounts.
>
> this is only for stable, established projects; if your project still breaks
> hemlock once a week, or you aren't certain it's working well, please don't
> add it.  similarly, new project proposals will not be considered (these
> should go to hemlock instead).
>
> if the stable server goes ahead, projects which are accepted will no longer be
> owned by the original author; the development team members will each have
> equal responsibility in their development.
>
> the exact configuration of the stable server, how it'll work, etc. are still
> in discussion.  (please feel free to edit [[m:Toolserver/Stable server]] if
> you have any suggestions).
>
>         - river.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Toolserver-l mailing list
> Toolserver-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
>
>
>