[QA] Discussion of tests for a clean wiki

[Chris McMahon]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Chris Steipp <csteipp at wikimedia.org> wrote:

>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Chris McMahon <cmcmahon at wikimedia.org>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Development environments:
>> * What may be more valuable would be bare-wiki tests for particular
>> development environment, for example a bare wiki with MobileFrontend
>> installed. Of course, the regression tests for an Extension on a clean
>> Mediawiki install would have to be managed from within that repo.
>>
>
> I'd vote for having a set of tests that should pretty much pass against a
> vagrant environment with just the mediawiki role enabled (basically core
> with no extensions). When we do MediaWiki major releases, we can take that
> and move it to whatever repo(s) get greated for the regression tests
> against the public releases.
>

I created an "enhancement" Bugzilla ticket for this under Quality
Assurance, and marked it "easy".
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60347 .  I don't see it as
being a high priority right now, but I don't want to lose sight of it
altogether either.
-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/qa/attachments/20140122/7e4bf0d3/attachment.html>