[Gendergap] Am I crazy?

Béria Lima beria.lima at wikimedia.pt
Mon Oct 24 18:12:49 UTC 2011


>
> *It would not have to be a gender related issue for this to occur.*
>

Fred is right in that point. I'm not a gender editor (my articles almost
never have problems with gender issues), however, the topic is one where you
can find the most biased people on earth: Religion.

And I would say you case was not the worst one, the worst case i can imagine
(and already happened with me several times) is to remove biased info (or
include NPOV info) in an article about a religion / god / dogma who is
watched by some believer of the same god / religion. ;)
_____
*Béria Lima*
Wikimedia Portugal <http://wikimedia.pt>
(351) 963 953 042

*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre
acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a
fazer.*


On 24 October 2011 18:54, Fred Bauder <fredbaud  fairpoint.net> wrote:

> > I've never particularly felt the "boys club" atmosphere on Wikipedia
> > that apparently deters some women. However, I am very angry right now.
> > I tried to add [[date rape]] as a "see also" link to the very
> > incomplete article [[college dating]]. The relevance seemed obvious to
> > me. It was removed by two separate people, and when I took it to the
> > talk page, its relevance was questioned, and I was told to "prove it"
> > because it was "obvious to whom?" Fine. I've proven it with sourcing,
> > adding a small section. I think that needed to happen anyway, but I'm
> > infuriated that I could not just add a see also link to it and tell
> > the students who are really working on the article that a section
> > needed adding. (The people who removed the link are seasoned
> > Wikipedians, not members of the class developing the article.) Am I
> > crazy?
> >
> > LadyofShalott
>
> No, that is the usual reaction of biased editors of all persuasions, to
> throw their mind out of gear, when obvious conclusions which contradict
> their bias are advanced.
>
> It would not have to be a gender related issue for this to occur.
>
> Fred
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap  lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
-------------- próxima parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/attachments/20111024/bbd7a841/attachment.htm 


More information about the Gendergap mailing list