[Gendergap] vulgar jokes and sexualized environments on Wikipedia

[carolmooredc at verizon.net]

To beef up women's assertiveness so they protest, or to give more power 
to some authoritarian editors to delete and block reverters, that is the 
question.  Why not do both?? :-)  Or just get more assertive female admins.

A job I myself shrink at the thought of. I already have enough problems 
just trying to edit the controversial articles I so often end up 
editing.  But then I am a glutton for punishment - or is it merely 
negative attention??

On 9/30/2011 3:35 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> Twice recently I have been reverted for removing vulgar jokes from
> article talk pages on the English Wikipedia - most recently for removing
> a joke who's punchline was "A woman's anus after she was sodomized!".
> Although I appreciate the use of humor on Wikipedia, and support the
> inclusion of potentially offensive material within appropriate contexts,
> I think these type of jokes are not appropriate on talk pages and create
> a sexualized environment that is often unwelcoming for women (as well as
> people from other cultures/religions/backgrounds). I think this issue is
> pertinent to the gender gap (unlike my other recent posts), and would
> like to hear other people's opinions. I've also started a discussion at
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Civility#Vulgar_jokes for
> broader input.
>
> Ryan Kaldari
>
>