[Foundation-l] Commons Usurp issue

George Herbert george.herbert at gmail.com
Wed Jun 4 00:20:21 UTC 2008


On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:14 PM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/6/4 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>:
>> (and the licensing concerns that
>> go along with that - I doubt anyone can say with absolute certainty
>> whether such usurpation is even legal,
>
> It probably isn't:
>
> I. Preserve the section Entitled "History", Preserve its Title, and
> add to it an item stating at least the title, year, new authors, and
> publisher of the Modified Version as given on the Title Page. If there
> is no section Entitled "History" in the Document, create one stating
> the title, year, authors, and publisher of the Document as given on
> its Title Page, then add an item describing the Modified Version as
> stated in the previous sentence.
>
>
> --
> geni

My recollection (and it's been a year since I was head-down in the DB
tables, so it may be wrong) is that the Database stores all the
changes by user ID not username - so, if you change an IDs associated
name (the usurped account being renamed) then the ownership / change
history changes along with it transparently.

If that is not correct I apologize, but that's what I remember of it...



-- 
-george william herbert
george.herbert at gmail.com



More information about the foundation-l mailing list