[Commons-l] GFDL-1.2 only - deletion discussion

[Robert Rohde]

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Codeispoetry <codeispoetry at adrianlang.de>
wrote:

> On Thu, March 13, 2008 8:14 pm, Bryan Tong Minh wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Bryan Tong Minh
> > <bryan.tongminh at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Deleting it many images.
> >>
> > That should have said "Deleting it implies deleting 3867 images".
>
> That's not correct since many of these files are double licensed. And in
> fact a template which is
> mainly used to disrupt the project is not really useful.
>

Could you elaborate on what you are refering to?   It is hard for me to
imagine how the presense of absense of "or later versions" could really be a
significant disruption to the project, given that there isn't even a later
version to refer to.

-Robert A. Rohde

PS. Along with Gmaxwell, I am one of those people who uses GFDL-1.2 rather
than simply GFDL because as a matter of principle I prefer not to agree to
new licenses until I've at least had a chance to review them.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/attachments/20080313/228f90f7/attachment.htm