On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Nikola Smolenski <smolensk(a)eunet.yu> wrote:
I translated the article from Russian Wikipedia so you
can see more details:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belarusian_orthography_reform_of_1933
My impression is that the difference between be and be-x-old is almost
purely political. The difference between the two spellings is not
bigger than between US and UK English.
I'm not blaming any side, because both of them present valid points.
The fact that there are two Wikipedias for this language is
particularly saddening, because it is in a rather problematic
situation to start with. While the sr/hr/bs/sh Wikipedia are all
(arguably) written in the same language with several spelling
standards, the language itself is undoubtedly out of any danger of
extinction, no matter what name you call it. Belarusian, on the other
hand, is under pressure from Russian. So in the case of Wikipedia,
instead of trying to understand which Wikipedia they should write and
read, many writers and readers who know the Belarusian language,
simply go to the Russian Wikipedia, so both be and be-x-old develop
very slowly.
I would be very glad to see paragraph 3 of the language policy
("different written forms") enforced in this case and these two
Wikipedias merged.
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni
heb:
http://haharoni.wordpress.com | eng:
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
cat:
http://aprenent.wordpress.com | rus:
http://amire80.livejournal.com
"We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace." - T. Moore