On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Asher Feldman <afeldman(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
That page wasn't suitable for high volume public
consumption (very
expensive db query + not properly cached), so the site problem persisted
even after the db initially suspected as bad was rotated out.
What happened to it? When this page was introduced, it did have proper
caching in memcached. Was that removed? Or did we get a cache
stampede?
Roan