Brion L. VIBBER wrote:
Sure, but more often kanji than kana, so special kana
markup wouldn't be
that big a win. See the thread "International Upgrades"; the vague plan
is to standardise the internal character set and present the wikipedias
in Unicode to capable browsers. (Please comment!)
Really? There are kanji in articles about Japan? I mean, articles
other than articles about the language or other special cases?
That seems odd to me. I'm not opposed to it, necessarily, but it
seems very odd. I mean, there's no reason to expect that kanji will
be useful to the vast majority of readers.
Can you send some examples?
--Jimbo