I don't mind getting dinged for typos. If I'm being sloppy it's fair to
point it out.
However, I think the social contract should be that after I fix the typos
you requested then you owe me a real code review where you look at the
merits of the code. Code review is an awesomely useful but time consuming
thing to provide. Patrolling for typos is not.
Put it this way, if I concede and agree that the bikeshed can be green, the
people who spent three hours arguing for green should feel obligated to
turn up to the working bee to help with the painting.
Luke Welling
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Bryan Tong Minh
<bryan.tongminh(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Jon Robson
<jdlrobson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is a ridiculous conversation and I can't
believe it now spans +20
messages.
Apparently you don't care, but other people do care. Please do not
disregard other people's opinions because you believe yours is correct.
To keep it in the style of this thread; attitudes like these do demotivate
_me_.
Also, I fully agree with Maarten's last comment.
Bryan
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l