Nanobug wrote (in part):
A minor point is if we did it this way, which format
would we use? e.g.
A | B | C ... or A - B - C ... or A, B, C ...
1990s | 1980s | 1970s ... or 1990s - 1980s - 1970s ... or 1990s,
1980s, 1970s
...
Which is the most common or looks the best? And is this a good idea in the
first
place (i.e. not try to totally automate it)?
1959 | 1960 | 1961 ... is the format used in the Grammy articles for the
"other years" list. I think this looks good and is very clear to read - I
think the same would work for any horizontal TOC
sannse