On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra(a)baylink.com> wrote:
While the topic of "how Mediawiki handles
URLs" is on the table, let me
point
out today's Slashdot piece, which notes that ICANN is about to open up the
gTLD namespace...
*to everyone*, not just commercial registries.
Contemplate, if you will:
http://apple/
How will MW handle a FQDN with no dots in it, when that becomes legal?
Those are already perfectly legal hostnames to have in URLs, and you see
single-part hostnames all the time on internal networks, either by eliding
the local domain part (since local DNS will resolve it) or by only using
single-part names to begin with.
For a common example: try linking to
http://localhost/ -- it works just
fine. :)
I suppose "in theory" having "apple" available is no worse than
"apple.com"
(since you *could* have an "apple.com.mylocaldomain" already and have to
worry about which takes precedence), but in practice that sounds like a
crappy thing to do. :)
-- brion