Le 07/03/2014 07:55, MZMcBride a écrit :
Tim Starling wrote:
>I would never have merged it, because it had
a -1 from Steven Walling,
>apparently speaking on behalf of others on design-l. I think changes
>should be made by consensus.
The change also had five +1s, as noted in this thread. I find it
interesting that, to you, consensus now includes a liberum veto. I'm fine
with a temporary revert if the change was causing an issue in production,
but the overall goal and execution seems fine to me.
X oppose and Y approve is not a consensus. X+Y approve is.
So a single -1 should prevent a change from being submitted until that
-1 is lifted by addressing the person concern(s) or correcting him/her
or whatever.
--
Antoine "hashar" Musso