20 seconds (gasp!) on Camino. Ugh.
Soxred
On Sep 17, 2008, at 10:00 AM [Sep 17, 2008 ], Aryeh Gregor wrote:
2008/9/17 Andrew Garrett <andrew(a)epstone.net>et>:
Chrome handles it fine on Windows (Dual core
2.4GHz, 2GB of RAM or
so). 2-3 seconds to load completely.
Firefox 3 on my computer takes maybe five seconds, and I've heard
there are at least some SVG speed improvements in 3.1:
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2008/07/
svg_filter_perf.html
Regardless, even a two-second render time is probably unacceptable for
inclusion into a page, and times even five images it's certainly not
tolerable. I certainly wouldn't call it "fine" to wait an extra two
seconds for a page to load. All client SVG implementations need to
become considerably faster before it's likely to be a good idea to
include complicated SVGs in web pages. Better hardware might even be
needed, given the costs of rasterization, but I don't know enough to
say whether that's true or not.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l