On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Alex Monk <krenair(a)gmail.com> wrote:
To clarify - are you saying this ([deploying
increasingly excellent
software on the Wikimedia production cluster in a consensus-oriented
manner]) is the actual current scope of ArchCom, or are you advocating for
a change in scope?
It's my attempt to clarify the scope, but you could argue it's a change.
Ultimately, WMF TechOps has correctly blocked a lot of software making it
to the Wikimedia cluster that hasn't been through the RFC process, even
though they themselves weren't entirely clear about the scope. Wikimedia
Foundation leadership has an (unfortunately) long history of being unclear
about the scope. I share the blame for this. This is my attempt to
clarify.
Rob