No, it is not meant to replace a [.com] RFC2606 compliant example URL with a
[.org] RFC2606 compliant example URL. This is what I meant to explain in the
commit message. What was causing the unclarity exactly?
Cheers! Siebrand
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: wikitech-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikitech-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] Namens Simetrical
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 juli 2008 18:22
Aan: wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Wikitech-l] [MediaWiki-CVS] SVN:
[37552]trunk/phase3/languages/messages/MessagesEn.php
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:57 AM, <siebrand(a)svn.wikimedia.org> wrote:
Log Message:
-----------
Use a .org RFC2606 compliant example URL . . .
-'extlink_sample' => 'http://www.example.com link title',
+'extlink_sample' => 'http://www.example.org link title',
Is this meant to imply that
example.com is not an RFC 2606-compliant example
URL? Because it is. RFC 2606 reserves the three domain names
example.com,
example.net, and
example.org, as well as the four top-level domain names
.test, .example, .invalid, and .localhost.