Jim Hu wrote:
Did you look at: Biblio or ProcessCite?
Anyway, if you wrote your own, I hope you'll make it open source for
others to try!
I did not find these when doing a web search for extensions, and I
without having studied them in detail, they may indeed be what I need.
It seems like these guys had the same problems with the cite extensions
as I found (inline references are impractical for scinetific papers).
Thank you for the information.
Now both of these extensions are tailored toward subjects related to the
biomedical field, since they are based upon pubmed, that don't index
papers in say physics, so an extenension like mine may have value in
other fields. My field (bioinformatics) are well inside what is covered
by pubmed however, so I could have avoided writing it.
When I now have written the extension I will release it when I have
tested it and implemented some more features.