On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Siebrand Mazeland
<s.mazeland(a)xs4all.nl> wrote:
No, it is not meant to replace a [.com] RFC2606
compliant example URL with a
[.org] RFC2606 compliant example URL. This is what I meant to explain in the
commit message. What was causing the unclarity exactly?
I interpreted the ".org RFC2606 compliant" modifier to be the reason
you were committing the change, since I saw no other explanation of
why you were doing it. I guess it's just because we like .org's more
than .com's or something, which is fine, but the commit message didn't
mention that.