Timwi wrote:
I cannot follow this line of reasoning. The purpose of
"being caseful",
as you call it, is to have (1) correct article titles, and (2) the
potential capability of having separate entries differing only in their
capitalisation.
Indeed.
My worry -- which I may not have thought through far enough --
was that if there was *too* much mapping from the case variant
that didn't exist to the case variant that did, it would be
impossible to create that second entry differing only in its
capitalization.