Daniel Kinzler wrote:
Anyone want to discuss any of the other RFCs?
If not, how about we just declare them closed/stalled/abandoned or
whatever?
Why? It's unclear to me what this would accomplish.
I'm pretty strongly in favor of treating RFCs the same way that we treat
bugs (now tasks): they live or die by their merits alone. It's largely
irrelevant who the author is or when the last activity was. What's
important is whether the RFC covers a reasonable, implement-able idea.
I'd much rather see energy put into finding volunteers to help move these
RFCs forward than I would see energy put into closing down discussions.
MZMcBride