On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Platonides <Platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote:
a) To encourage reuse and
b) Avoid debates about using the libraries with other non-GPL code (eg.
under PHP license)
The exact same considerations apply to MediaWiki as a whole, though,
and there are also considerations in favor of GPL. Clearly some
people prefer BSD, but what does this have to do with breaking code
out into libraries? It seems orthogonal, so I was puzzled by you
mentioning it in this particular context. (You can license your files
as BSD if you like even if they're in MediaWiki core, or at least some
people have done that.)