On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Sébastien Santoro
<dereckson(a)espace-win.org> wrote:
At the end, the direct commit message edit in the UI
will offer an
acceptable solution: corrections will be more trivial than found again
my branch, amend the commit, resubmit as a new patchset. Meanwhile, we
can suffer the last weeks of extra work for review spelling (as 0 or
-1) purpose pending the Gerrit migration.
And really, this is just a few weeks out. I've been testing the upgrade,
and I'm confident we won't see any real problems. I'm planning to do
it as soon as the eqiad migration is complete next week.
And if you don't want to fix yourselves your
commit, please create a
list stating so on
mediawiki.org, that will be a clear message for the
code reviewers: "If you see a typo, would you be so kind as to fix it
yourself and submit a new patchset?".
Please no. We really don't want to encourage people to be lazy
because they think people will clean up after them.
Really, I think the whole thread is moot with the pending upgrade.
Typos should always be fixed before merging (I think we all agree?),
and the new abilities to fix these from the UI means we won't need
to mark people as -1 to do so.
-Chad