On 10 June 2014 09:19, Brian Wolff <bawolff(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 10, 2014 1:10 PM, "Jon Robson"
<jdlrobson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The other mail seems to have gone on a huge tangent about the benefits
of Flow / what it can do. This is great but I feel like my original
question has gone unanswered so I am resurrecting it with a new e-mail
subject. I worry lots of good feedback got lost in that big email
chain.
So hypothetically... If we switched over from the unmaintained
LiquidThreads (LQT) to the maintained Flow what would happen? [By this
I mean on every page regardless of namespace that LQT is we enable
Flow instead.]
Some top level questions to get started:
1) Do we need to import all conversations over OR can we just switch
to a blank page to get started from?
2) What can you do in LQT that you cannot do in Flow? (Please do not
include issues with design - this is a new product that can be
redefined as it is developed on)
3) Any other concerns?
You are talking about mw.org? I think non
mediawiki.org wikis requires a
> longer discussion. Id suggest just doing
mw.org for the time being.
I disagree. Instead, I would suggest having just the smidgen of patience
and actually waiting when the Flow team have responded on the thread and
told you it'd take some time, rather than posting the same request in a
second thread because you didn't get the answer you wanted.
J.
--
James D. Forrester
Product Manager, VisualEditor
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
jforrester(a)wikimedia.org | @jdforrester