I support this. It would give me time to follow up with assignees after a
bug day before the next bug day.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Quim Gil <qgil(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On 01/17/2013 09:54 AM, Chris McMahon wrote:
In a positive way. ;)
If after every week sprint a group gets one contributor more, then the
chances of having a better next sprint will increase.
Following the proposal, we don't need formal MediaWiki groups start
turning the wheel. With Chris, Andre, Zeljko and Valerie we have enough to
push the cycles.
Of course each activity will need to have participants, and these
participants might be interested in staying in touch, discuss and plan
other tasks. This is where the groups might help to coordinate and generate
better week sprints.
I haven't been around long enough, but one problem we seem to have is that
even successful activities leave little heritage for future events. Apart
from the people continuously engaged e.g. through this list, it's almost
like we are starting from scratch every time. Hopefully the groups will
help bridging activities and growing continuously.
--
Quim Gil
Technical Contributor Coordinator @ Wikimedia Foundation
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/**User:Qgil<http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/…
______________________________**_________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l<https://lists.…