On Sep 26, 2004, at 10:57 PM, Ivan Krstic wrote:
Brion Vibber wrote:
A possible alternative which has been brought up
before is to avoid
changing the structure of the old table, rather pullings its
non-textual data out to a separate table and continuing to use the
old table (unaltered) as a store for old_text. This avoids copying
around the most data and should in theory be faster.
I had volunteered to do this, and have had a nearly-done patch on hand
for a while now, but my ability to find time to code disappeared when
classes started. Is there still interest in me finishing this?
Please do.
-- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)