On 23 August 2013 16:25, Marc A. Pelletier <marc(a)uberbox.org> wrote:
On 08/23/2013 02:36 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
You mean like my $wgSecureGroups approach?
Because if people actually
still
want that I can attempt to revive that part of my
patch. I think it'd be
of
especial interest to require HTTPS for checkusers
and oversight people,
due
to the legal problems associated with breaches to
those accounts.
+1
I also see some value to this, and I speak as a member of both those
groups. I'd like to see what can be developed, however, to support
Checkusers/Oversighters/Stewards who have difficulty using HTTPS, and I
have already initiated an offline discussion with Chris and others at the
WMF about this.
Risker/Anne