On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Danny B. <Wikipedia.Danny.B(a)email.cz> wrote:
Not true. XHTML 1 was NOT violated.
I am not going to discuss this any further with you as long as you
refuse to accept the fact that there is disagreement on this and that
your interpretation is no more important than mine vis-a-vis
MediaWiki. If you can't even agree to disagree, there's no point in
my talking to you.
What you mean by "automatically added as part of
the encoding process"? Does that mean that if I'll write [[#foo]] it will
automatically create the #xfoo anchor?
No. If you write [[#foo]] it will create a #foo anchor. If you write
#0 it will create a #x0 anchor. Try it out on trunk before you invent
baseless objections.
2008/12/28 Danny B. <Wikipedia.Danny.B(a)email.cz>cz>:
I really don't feel comfortable that instead of
discussion you continue to push your like-to-be solution. :-(
That commit was not pushing anything. Brion set the status quo of
names being copied to id's, and given that status quo, I only fixed it
so that it didn't produce invalid XHTML, at Brion's suggestion. This
is something that I had planned to do for a long time, independent of
the current issue (i.e., even if anchors used only the name
attribute).