On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Jeroen De Dauw <jeroendedauw(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hey,
I have observed a difference in opinion between two groups of people on
gerrit, which unfortunately is causing bad blood on both sides. I'm
therefore interested in hearing your opinion about the following scenario:
Someone makes a sound commit. The commit has a clear commit message, though
there is a single typo in it. Is it helpful to -1 the commit because of the
typo?
This is a non issue in the very near future. Once we upgrade (testing
now, planning for *Very Soon* after eqiad migration), we'll have the
ability to edit commit messages and topics directly from the UI. I
think this will save people a lot of time downloading/amending changes
just to fix typos.
Personally, I think all typos should be fixed, since this becomes an
immutable part of the history once submitted. But hopefully this will
be much easier for people soon :)
-Chad