David Gerard wrote:
I think you are completely and utterly wrong on this.
I think you didn't really read my posting properly, and you only posted
this for the sake of appearing cleverer or having the last word.
As Jay already mentioned, we are actually agreeing with each other. I
never said absolutely anything that would suggest that the wiki engine
would "just spit back "INVALID CONTENT"". If you had thought about
what
you wrote instead of just blasting it out into the mailing list, you
would have realised that browsers also don't "just spit back "INVALID
CONTENT"", but this doesn't mean any conceivable sequence of characters
is valid HTML.
Timwi