Roan Kattouw wrote:
2009/12/1 Marcus Buck <wiki(a)marcusbuck.org>rg>:
If there are performance problems with the
conversion on serving or
anything like that, of course storing the data in 5.0 is still good
enough.
You're answering your own question here: converting the data once and
storing it in 5.0 so it's ready-to-serve is of course faster and
easier than juggling between 5.0 and 5.1 all the time.
That was my first thought, but I notice in Praveen's link that chillu-k
has no Unicode 5.0 representation. It's described as "not very common",
so maybe this isn't a big deal, but is your thinking just to store (and
transmit) the 5.1 code for chillu-k, while converting the rest to 5.0?
Or is their some Malayalam typographical convention that is used now
that we should honor instead?
William