On 10/08/2011 8:47 AM, Chad wrote:
I guess that's only embarrassing if those sorts of
things bother you.
I think it would be fair to have it both ways. There are a class of
people who are bothered by things of that sort. I'm sure I'm not alone,
at least on this issue. :P
I'm with Dan on this one, I've never thought
those validator buttons
are very nice additions to a website. Remind me a little too much of
the "Optimized for NN4" buttons of old.
I think there's a pretty big difference between providing a feature
whereby a user can validate the HTML they've just authored and
proclaiming browser patronage.