Praveen Prakash wrote:
Is it possible to implement some method to tell server
both characters
are same??
No.
It is heard that more changes coming in future
versions of
unicode. And now almost half of the data coming is in unicode 5.1
version. I am not sure about reverse converting.
That link you gave in your last post had a conversion table, it looks
pretty straightforward:
CHILLU NN -> NNA, VIRAMA, ZWJ
CHILLU N -> NA, VIRAMA, ZWJ
CHILLU RR -> RA, VIRAMA, ZWJ
CHILLU L -> LA, VIRAMA, ZWJ
CHILLU LL -> LLA, VIRAMA, ZWJ
The other new characters would remain unconverted.
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
Given that we should be moving forward not backward, it makes more sense to
provide Unicode 5.1 characters and webfonts.
The big thing of MediaWiki was that it supported Unicode when this was still
a new thing to do. We should support the latest and the best Unicode
support.
You did read the post didn't you? Forcing everyone to buy Windows 7 is
not generally the way we do things. Unless the client situation is not
as bad as it sounds, we will need to have a transition period where we
support older clients until their market share falls far lower than
50%, which is where, by Praveen's figures, it is now.
-- Tim Starling