On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 02:38:45AM +1100, Tim Starling wrote:
Something
semantic would seem better, yes. Are there other meanings
for which you'd want to hide the category? And should stub categories
be hidden by default?
You can always use a template, if you want semantic annotation. A template
containing __HIDDENCAT__ would make any category that included it a hidden
category.
FWIW, I concur that the *mechanism* should probably be results-based,
as long as you can *wrap* it in semantic sugar, which here, you can.
This implies that the online documentation that tells people how to
make use of it should make this point, and possibly explicitly
discourage people from using the underlying facility without (creating)
a semantic wrapper.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra(a)baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates
http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA
http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
Those who count the vote decide everything.
-- (Joseph Stalin)