On 13 December 2012 10:44, Daniel Friesen <daniel(a)nadir-seen-fire.com> wrote:
More importantly while quality is nice, that's not
what's really important.
More important than quality is coverage. Getting photos of those things that
we don't have photos for. That is where mobile devices will always be
superior than said Nikon or Sony cameras. Images of things taken spur of the
moment no-one has taken an image of yet. Especially in remote areas, sudden
events, etc...
Every article on a place needs a video, for example. (That's why we
need to be able to ingest absolutely any rubbish a phone can produce
and upload.)
- d.