Out of curiosity, has anyone experimented with configuring cacheing within
apache itself?
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_cache.html
It is my understanding that squid takes advantage the same pragma headers
that mod cache can look at - I wonder if there is an intermediate
configuration that can be tuned and recommended without having to install a
separate proxy server.
mod_cache is something I plan to look at in conjunction with MW as soon as
performance requirements demands it (and time permits ).
/Jonah
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Triantos" <nick(a)triantos.com>
To: "Wikimedia developers" <wikitech-l(a)wikimedia.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] performance
It's also certainly worth looking at installing
Squid
(
http://www.squid-cache.org) if you haven't, yet. That made a huge
difference on the MW install I've got on an intranet at work, and also
reduced the memory footprint.
cheers,
-Nick
Paul Youlten wrote:
did you try installing the PHP booster Turck
MMCache? I'm not allowed to
on my shared server - but it appears to give performance a big boost.
Paul
----- Original Message ----- From: "NSK" <nsk2(a)wikinerds.org>
To: <wikitech-l(a)Wikimedia.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 11:54 PM
Subject: [Wikitech-l] performance
MediaWiki 1.3.9 and 1.4beta4 are very slow and
uses too many CPU cycles
and
memory compared to other wikis. The database schema, as I see it, seems
to be
inefficient. Are there any changes planned for 1.4 final to increase
performance?
--
NSK
http://portal.wikinerds.org
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l