Hi,
I am totally agreed with Bodhisattwa's point of view. I supporting
to Nicolas as a liaison person from the Wikisource Community UG.
Regards,
Jayanta
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:28 PM Nicolas VIGNERON <vigneron.nicolas(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
Sadly, I tend to agree with you Bodhisattwa! The proposals are
disheartening...
That said, I don't think this is completely pointless tho. The RfC (I'm
guessing you talk about
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_…
) has been mostly unheard by the Foundation, that's is why - I think - this
is important to say it again on the official survey. That's why I think our
voices matter here.
If you didn't or don't have time to watch the whole video on Youtube, here
is the summary page of the 3 proposals :
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme…
(with subpages for each proposal), which I can resume with the examples of
the renaming of the Wikimedia movement :
- option 1: Wikipedia Network
- option 2: Wikipedia Movement
- option 3: Wiki
All three options remove the term "Wikimedia" to replace it by
"Wikipedia"
and indeed, there is no statu quo option... But we can still reject all
options (either say they're all "very bad" or rank them from
"bad" to "very
bad", for me 1 and 3 are "very bad" and 2 is only "bad").
In any case, Wikisource and the Wikisource Community User Group will not
be rename and are not directly concerned by the current renaming. Still, I
think that the name "Wikipedia" overtaking the whole movement is a bad
symbol and an invisibilization of other Wikimedia projects.
The survey is long (and all questions mandatory) but I encourage you to
still fill it personally and to help me to find the answer for the
affiliate filling. Before answering it, you can see the question on
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme…
to have an overview.
Should we create a page on meta to collect our point of view and prepare
the global answer? or do you prefer to talk by mails? (you can send me a
private mail if you don't want to speak on this public list, I'm also
available on various social medias, feel free to get in touch with me).
Cheers,
~nicolas
Le ven. 19 juin 2020 à 06:17, Bodhisattwa Mandal <
bodhisattwa.rgkmc(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
Hi Nicolas,
I don't think our voices really matter in this case. Check the RfC,
people are still voting against 'Wikipedia' as a brand name, but the survey
has only one option which is three variants of Wikipedia. It doesn't even
have the option of status quo. This is very frustrating to say, but this is
the truth that we cannot change anything through this survey or
participating in the process, as the outcome is already decided. The
process is just an eye-wash to show that the community was consulted.
Personally I feel, this whole process is completely biased, pre-decided
and non-transparent. There is no point wasting time here.
Regards,
Bodhisattwa
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, 16:10 Nicolas VIGNERON <vigneron.nicolas(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi y'all,
In case you didn't see it already, here is a reminder that the Naming
Convention Proposals Presentation will start in ~4 hours at 15:00 UTC
<https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Brand+Naming+Presentation&iso=20200616T15&p1=1440&ah=1>
on YouTube :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3zlBGHHHiY
Something that you may not know, is that the Wikisource Community User
Group has a voice in this process.
More exactly here is a copy-paste of a mail I received yesterday from
Samir Elsharbaty (Community Brand and Marketing coordinator at the
Wikimedia Foundation):
*Feedback period: For affiliates and individuals from 16 June to 30 June
2020. A collective feedback survey link will be shared with your email
addresses next week. This survey is a primary way for affiliates to submit
feedback as a group on the proposals. If you would like to change the email
address we send the survey to, please let us know. Affiliate Liaisons: The
most straightforward way for your affiliate to provide feedback during this
phase and the upcoming ones is by designating an affiliate liaison to be a
connection point between our team and your affiliate. If you are interested
in designating a liaison to receive updates and facilitate discussions,
please reply to this email.*
I proposed my name to be the liaison for the Wikisource Community UG, if
anyone else is interested, they can join or even replace me.
And if you have any comments or remarks about the propositions, please
share them (before end of June) so I can then share them in the survey.
Cheers,
Nicolas
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l