As to the first question, unfortunately no, only squid hit logs are maintained.
-Aaron Schulz
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:39:20 -0700
From: luca(a)dealfaro.org
To: wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] WikiTrust v2 released: reputation andtrustforyour wiki in
real-time!
Regarding the issue of long-untouched pages:
1) are there some statistics, in mediawiki, that allow a process to check how many times a
page has been accessed? I can of course add a new hook and a db table, but it may not
work due to caching, and as this would run for every hit, I don't want to increase
load.
2) The best way to add this reconsideration of long-unchanged pages is to implement it as
a batch process, i.e., not run from apache. This would mean that the job can be run as a
cron job, or as a daemon, or something like that, in the background, at low enough rate
not to cause trouble. Does this approach sound satisfactory to you?
Oh, and what is en.labs?
Luca
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:42 AM, mike.lifeguard <mike.lifeguard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Well, en.labs would be best, as it is a
site for testing :D But yes, English Wikibooks is a good candidate once we have
explored the issue of long-untouched pages (ie the trust should be
recalculated, I think)
Mike
From:
wikiquality-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikiquality-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Luca de Alfaro
Sent: August 26, 2008 10:59 PM
To: Wikimedia
Quality Discussions
Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l]
WikiTrust v2 released: reputation andtrustforyour wiki in real-time!
Yes, I fully agree.
We should start on a small project where people are interested.
We can consider the bigger wikis later, once we are confident that we like it
and it works the way we want.
I was citing Enwiki just to discuss potential performance.
Ian and I can help with advice etc anyone who wants to try this out.
Luca
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:42 PM, mike.lifeguard
<mike.lifeguard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>even on the
English Wikipedia (5 edits /
second at most?) a single CPU
> would suffice
But why start so large? Pick a smaller test wiki first like, say,
en.wikibooks? We can throw that into the queue of things we want
installed down at WB.
--Andrew Whitworth
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
_________________________________________________________________
Get thousands of games on your PC, your mobile phone, and the web with Windows®.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108588800/direct/01/