2007/4/29, R. S. Shaw <shaww(a)inbox.com>om>:
Against it is that recent versions remain hidden, even
though not vandalized, until someone puts in the effort to do a new inspection (and often
editing) to produce a new, more recent, "Examined/Quality" version.
Yes, that's the problem. We have to keep in mind that no matter what
the exact definition of "examined/reviewed" is, it will require more
effort to tag than sighted. Since we are not really sure whether the
tagging of versions as sighted will actually scale, I'm quite sure
that tagging as examined will not. Thus, the usual situation will be
the one mentioned by RS will be quite common. Therefore, I would
suggest not giving examined precedence. This is also already part of
the german proposal.
Bye,
Philipp