shaww(a)inbox.com wrote:
For the revision status message boxes at the top of a page ...
[These icons] would be presented in addition to that text, next to the
text. Thus if X and Y are icons it would look something like this:
Accuracy: X Draft level Depth: Y Stub
jschulz_4587(a)msn.com wrote:
Maybe icons could mark "quality/stable" versions in some contexts, but as
for each rating, I'd rather go with the text, or the text and the blue
bars
or such. Any use of icons alone would be more confusing as readers
wouldn't
know what they meant. Icons are really only good for yes/no fields.
Upon reflection, I agree we shouldn't use this value-icons idea. At best it would
just be a frill, and is not needed now.
So the message boxes at page tops would go back to the way they had been on Phase3, with
ratings expressed in text like this:
Accuracy: Draft level Depth: Stub Readability: Good
I think the "quality/stable" marking in Version History pages is fairly
important, and that should be done. The display could easily be done with either HTML
(Colored background and a monospace character, for instance) or icons.
-RS
____________________________________________________________
FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop!
Check it out at
http://www.inbox.com/earth