OK, I don't like the idea of reducing all of the tags to just one, it still
useful to have a depth/style rating, or any others. The idea is that sighted
revisions are just at minimal quality in each type.
The schema has been changed quite a bit, though I think I am satisfied with
how it is now.
The basic idea of a sighted level, and an expert reviewed level is still
enforced, the tags are for sorting what falls into "sighted" and
"expert" on
reviewer. If new dimensions are added to the site later on, sighted and
expert reviewed revisions still behave as they did.
Expert reviewed revisions take precedence over sighted revisions.
By default we have the following classification:
*quality (expert reviewed): accuracy >= 2, depth >= 1, style >=1
*stable (sighted): accuracy >=1, depth >= 1, style >=1
Revisions cannot be reviewed unless each tag type is at least at level 1.
Reviewed revisions should at least be decent in each category, otherwise
reviewing them would look bad.
The Editor group is autoassigned (though it can be removed manually and will
not be auto added again). The reviewer right must be done manually, as it
gives full access. This is done through Special:Makevalidate. By defaut,
emailconfirmed editors with 1000 edits, here for 60 days, are promoted to
editors automatically. Any user can be manually promoted sooner.
<html><div><FONT color=#3333cc>-Jason
Schulz</FONT></div></html>
_________________________________________________________________
Mortgage refinance is Hot. *Terms. Get a 5.375%* fix rate. Check savings
https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035&url=%2fst.jsp&tm…