On 4/2/07, Erik Moeller <erik(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I think that's pretty important to have; if want
vandalism review
(which is going to have the biggest PR impact) to be scalable, we need
to be able to flag lots of changes by trusted users automatically as
non-vandalism.
My understanding of this feature was that if the current version is
trusted and a trusted editor edits it, their version will preserve the
non-vandalized level of review automatically. Correct?
(I'm working on some models predicting how long we can expect between
not vandalized flaggings given some reasonable assumptions)