As I said before, even dirty perscriptivists (viz Perrin, C.) always
come to accept language change _eventually_.
Otherwise, the text of your message would have read like something
more along the lines of "Spec þū fore þin sylf!" (Stephen Forrest may
correct me here in the case that ic may've spake me here in a
wrong-like manner yar)
Mark
On 28/05/05, Chad Perrin <perrin(a)apotheon.com> wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 12:25:17PM -0400, Gregory
Maxwell wrote:
172,000 google hits says that one day we will consider it a valid
spelling of something. :)
Lots of places you would expect to be spellchecked contain "reknowned".
Speak for yourself.
--
Chad Perrin
[ CCD CopyWrite |
http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
SI HOC LEGERE SCIS NIMIVM ERVDITIONIS HABES
QVANTVM MATERIAE MATERIETVR MARMOTA MONAX SI MARMOTA MONAX MATERIAM
POSSIT MATERIARI
ESTNE VOLVMEN IN TOGA AN SOLVM TIBI LIBET ME VIDERE